目錄

1. 克魯門的三打理論概述
2. 克魯門的三打理論的依據(jù)[1]
3. Krugman‘s Three Hit Theory
4. 參考文獻

克魯門的三打理論（Krugman‘s Three Hit Theory）

克魯門的三打理論概述

　　三打理論是赫伯特·克魯門（Herbert E. Krugman）博士在1972年提出的。他在《為何刊播三次就夠》一文中曾提出以下主張：

　　先是刺激消費者試著了解信息，去問“這個廣告是什么”；

　　第二次刺激消費者去評量，去問“廣告內(nèi)容是什么”、“我曾經(jīng)看過這個廣告嗎”；

　　第三次接觸時，回憶并開始逃離廣告。三次，足以對消費者產(chǎn)生作用。

　　概括起來就是：消費者對廣告的反應有三個階段：

• 第一次看到廣告的反應是“這是什么？”

• 第二次產(chǎn)生好奇，并對廣告消息產(chǎn)生熟悉感；

• 第三次產(chǎn)生確認感，并起到強化與提醒作用。甚至會促使其采取行動。

　　三次以上可能產(chǎn)生浪費，低于三次，則難以跨越門檻效應。三次必須是有效接觸。

　　他認為，人們普遍相信的“廣告需要不斷強化才能防止受眾忘卻”的觀點是片面的，廣告不斷暴露，還不如廣告發(fā)布的最初的二至三次有效。對于產(chǎn)品是否符合自己的需求，三次廣告接觸就可以明確了解，以后看多少次，其效果都是一樣的。

克魯門的三打理論的依據(jù)^[1]

　　這一觀點具有哪些方面的依據(jù)作為它的支撐呢？

　?。?）從心理學的學習理論來看，人們隨著語言和視覺的刺激，會逐漸增加學習反應，但是隨著頻率的增加，效果會達到一個飽和點，以后逐漸下降。三次，就是庫魯曼博士所認為已達到的“飽和點”。

　?。?）從注意的角度來看，一家公司利用一種測定儀器進行調(diào)查的結果表明，電視廣告在播出兩至四次時，消費者對它們注意與關心的程度最大，以后即使頻率增加，效果也會遞減。

　?。?）從消費者對不同商品的關注曲線來看，消費者對不同商品的廣告的接觸在兩至四次時都會達到注意的高峰，以后逐漸降低。

　?。?）從頻率高低的效果來看，無論廣告以密集式還是分散式播出，引起受眾注意的效果都以三次為最高。

　　（5）從消費者行為的改變來看，在一個購買周期中，消費者看到兩次廣告而更換品牌的頻率最高。

　　根據(jù)一般的記憶規(guī)律，大多數(shù)消費者確實需要有三次信息暴露，才能產(chǎn)生記憶。如果觀眾連續(xù)受到五次以上廣告信息的刺激，其記憶度可增加30%以上?；貞洺潭燃敖⒌膽B(tài)度在廣告中斷期間有所衰退。廣告停止以后，廣告效果也不會立刻終止。

　　至于多少次廣告有效，其實這個問題并無定論，有的廣告重復四次之后就出現(xiàn)了負效果，而有的重復了七次，消費者的關注與接受曲線仍在上升。

Krugman‘s Three Hit Theory

　　Herbert E. Krugman was the manager of corporate public opinion research at General Electric. He was both a practitioner and an academic. He received his Ph.D from Columbia University.

　　According to Krugman‘s low-involvement theory, when people view advertising without thinking about it, they do not fully consider or process the message of the ad. There is no significant attitude change. However, advertising can influence consumer decision-making without conscious awareness. Repeated exposure to advertising can lead to changes in the perceptions of what is important about a brand without the conscious or verbal recognition on the consumer‘s part. This can also be considered in terms of top-of-mind awareness. Repeated exposure to advertising creates top-of-mind awareness. The consumer holds no opinion of the brand until he or she recognizes it in the store and decides to buy it. Only after trial is an attitude formed.

　　According to Krugman (1977), "low-involvement theory seemed to challenge the rule of reason and to confirm the idiocy of the so-called ‘boob tube‘ and perhaps even advertising".

　　No doubt Krugman‘s concept went against the conventional wisdom of the day. It was believed that consumers sought out information that concerned them, and screened out messages that were not relevant. Krugman suggested that the message was neither screened out nor actively processed, but shifted to long-term memory where an unconscious brand image was formed (Harris, 1987)

　　According to Krugman, there are special qualities of one, two and three exposures. He stops at three because there is no such thing as a fourth exposure psychologically; rather fours, fives, etc., are repeats of the third exposure effect.

　　"Exposure No. 1 is...a "What is it?" type of... response. Anything new or novel no matter how uninteresting on second exposure has to elicit some response the first time...if only to discard the object as of no further interest...

　　The second exposure...response...is "What of it?"...whether or not the message has personal relevance...

　　"By the third exposure the viewer knows he‘s been through his "What is it‘s?" and "What of it‘s?," and the third, then, becomes the true reminder . . . The importance of this view . . . is that it positions advertising as powerful only when the viewer...is interested in the [product message]...Secondly, it positions the viewer as...reacting to the commercial--very quickly...when the proper time comes round."

　　Many in the media world interpreted what Krugman wrote as three media (vehicle) exposures. What Krugman calls "frequency" is not what media planners would call "frequency". Krugman doesn‘t discuss media frequency at all.

　　Krugman‘s three exposures theory is all about psychological exposures.

參考文獻

1. ↑ 江民繁.理論假設的“飽和點”是三次——廣告頻次及廣告強度之四

其他產(chǎn)品包裝設計參考

包裝設計欣賞迷你培根＜ HW ＞ (波旁)

　　　　商品簡介:“西爾本”系列新單品。 三角形巧克力蛋糕“西爾本”的美味依舊，小巧可愛，尺寸方便食用。 因為是單個包裝，所以適合做點心。 個人裝、外袋都是限時

包裝設計欣賞彎彎曲曲＜歐洲糖玉米味＞ ( clashe )

　　　　商品概要:“彎彎曲曲”系列新道具。 與“歐洲糖玉米”的合作。 把粉和水混合在一起就會變色膨脹的軟點心。 通過“彎彎曲曲”可以品嘗到“歐洲糖玉米”的味道。

包裝設計欣賞乳酸菌飲料GABAplus+ (小球藻食品哈克)

　　　　商品概要:在傳統(tǒng)乳酸菌飲料GABA的基礎上增加了維持肌膚彈性的能力。 通過GABA的作用，有助于提高睡眠質(zhì)量，具有緩和精神壓力和疲勞感、維持皮膚彈性、降

聲明:本站品牌策劃與包裝設計作品部分為原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容，本文克魯門的三打理論關鍵詞為“克魯門的三打理論是什么營銷廣告怎么做，”頁面信息僅供參考和借鑒，如有侵權、錯誤信息或任何問題，請及時聯(lián)系我們，我們將立即刪除或更正。